Showing posts with label Friendship. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Friendship. Show all posts

Friday, October 27, 2023

Good leaders have a strong professional critic

 “Lieutenant, get in my f—-ing office, now!”  I can hear that voice as if it happened this morning, the day that Captain Chris Dessaso laid into me in one of the most memorable ass chewings of my lifetime.  It was my first unit assignments and I had really made a mistake.  Charlie 1-10 Infantry was a basic training company at Fort Leonard Wood, MO, that was arguably the best in the Battalion and certainly in the top tier of the Brigade.  And a big part of that was Chris’ drive for excellence and willingness to lay down the law as the commander to achieve it.  As a young, wet behind the ears, and eager second lieutenant, I was all about doing my best and driving hard in what equated to a 5 to 9 job, 7 days a week.  My mistake, however, was to open my mouth to his spouse about some inner murmurings that not everything was going as well as the commander thought they were, and that he needed to think about that some.  It was a classic case of “going around the boss” that proved to be a colossal failure.  But I learned more than that the next morning as I was in the front leaning rest before his desk as he raged for what seemed to be an interminable length of time.  It wasn’t just a lesson on why not going direct to your boss with concerns was a bad idea or don’t mistake cordiality of relationships with your boss’ spouse as a way to relay messages.  No, I learned a key lesson that I think every leader absolutely needs to learn:  you need to have a harsh, respected, professional, critic that can stab you in the eye when you need it.


One of my weaknesses as a leader is that I get what I call “sagely”.  It’s a mixture of both being a “know it all” and having way too much pride/confidence for my own good.  I am a type “A” personality.  Or as my wife puts it, I’m an over achiever.  Lots of folks around give me feedback that can absolutely stroke my ego and go to my head.  And sometimes it does just that.  But that is precisely when I need to be crushed back down to planet earth.  Jackie, in my personal life, is very adept at putting me in my place, and I deeply love her for that (even as sometimes I’d not like to admit it or appreciate it in the moment).  But in my professional life it’s been critical as well to have someone be my sounding board and to set me in my place periodically, less I travel down a road that hurts the mission and objectives of the work I’m trying to do, never mind myself and my career.  In my mind, as a result, I am beyond convinced, every good leader needs to have a mentor, peer, or other designated person in your professional life who’s job it is to knock you off your proverbial high horse, regularly.  And those who rise to high heights that don’t have this, not only fail as leaders, fail personally, but fail to actually be leaders in reality.


There are several historical examples of this reality, both in colossal failures and phenomenal success.  Napoleon is a classic example of where he did not have this critic, and it led him to exceptionally destructive behaviors, including the devastating March to Moscow.  But we can and should look at examples where the opposite occurred.  A pair of great examples were arguably our two best Presidents ever, Washington and Lincoln.   Both of these two leaders had such critics that served them well.  In Washington’s case he relied on Hamilton for this to a degree as well as ensuring he had a cast of rivals around him as advisors including Jefferson as well as Madison.  In Lincoln’s case, he had Seward and a similar team of rivals (to use a title of a famous biography of him) that he used to check himself.  Both of these leaders could not have risen to the heights they did without the required professional critic that they depended on to seek out and find the flaws in their leadership styles and approaches to issues.  While they were brilliant into themselves and had hearty egos to go with it, they knew that they had to dispatch with sycophants, surround themselves with capable persons who challenged them, and keep hubris in abeyance.


In my life, I have been a part of organizations where I’ve seen where the appointed or selected leader, both failed to have this kind of critic that was taken seriously and respected, and ones where they had one or two and thus the entire enterprise benefitted.  It was among the reasons for the clear differences between my two combat tours in Iraq.  Tour #1 went through two O-5 Battalion Commanders who didn’t remain grounded, despite the Battalion’s motto being “Down to Earth”.  The second had a full bird Colonel who had a Command Sergeant Major (CSM) who was unabashed in laying out his often forceful criticisms.  While not always going with the advice he got from his CSM, DeLuca listened and ensured he ameliorated the risks because of the criticisms he received.  Similarly, at two academic institutions, I have now witnessed the consequences of when the President has a person in his cabinet that holds significant sway and his respect that was a part of the loyal opposition, and one that has not.  The former thrived and the other is at a proverbial crossroads.


To me then, the sign of a great leader, is whom he or she or they surround themselves with. Do they have a distinct person or cadre thereof, professionally, that challenge them and tell them the harsh truth about themselves, such that the leader changes and grows and avoids their worst impulses?  Or are they unwilling to own that the failure in most organizations starts with them?  Leaders have to hold both those around them accountable as well as themselves.  The only way to do that is have someone that can confront them, who they respect and listen to, which will help them be the change they need to be in order for themselves and those they lead to be as successful as they can be.


“Erik you really have changed,” said Derrick Edmond, a peer during my second deployment to Iraq.  Going into what is probably one of my most successful military assignments, I was a very headstrong and direct leader within our small Facilities Engineer Detachment of 15 people.  Derrick, along with another officer whom I respected, along with the OIC, early on, pulled me aside and pointed out my flaw in my character.  I was not respecting some members of the team because I was so “high speed” and had expressed unrealistic expectations of the others to think, act, and function as I did.  Hearing this, I changed my approach and made choices to engage with the team.  It took conscious effort, I had to check some of my instincts, but in the end it made me and the whole team much more successful.  And this hasn’t been the only time.  Having someone that I check in with regularly that can give me honest feedback about my flaws and where I need to improve is among my most important colleagues and friends I can have.  If you too are a leader, make sure you have this professional guide in your midst; for your sake and that of those around you.

Wednesday, January 18, 2017

Where we should go Camping, or Not

Where we should go Camping, or Not


As some probably well know, I spend some time on social media.  Among the feeds I typically follow, and often comment on, is the “ELCA” closed Facebook group.  ELCA, meaning: Evangelical Lutheran Church in America, being the Christian denomination I am a part of.  One of the moderators, Pastor Clint Schnekloth of Good Shepherd Lutheran Church in Fayetteville, AK, posted the cover of a Lutheran theological journal, “Logia”, to prompt a discussion; and so it did.  This journal is published for the express purpose to “promote the orthodoxy of the Evangelical Lutheran Church.”[i]  This said, the point of his posting it was to cause us to think on the cover image for ourselves in order to reflect on it and its critique of, or lack thereof, its titled discussion point:  Lutheran Triumphalism.  Helpfully, one commenter actually posted the journal editor's comments, which also includes a picture of the cover for your review:  http://www.logia.org/logia-online/a-word-about-the-cover2017.

What got me to respond was a comment made to the effect of, “is the person pictured, then, to not be considered in the ‘good camp.’”[ii]  This really struck me that one of the immediate reactions was to think about which "camp" someone is in, and caused me to respond both specific to the questioner, and as well to the broader question.  The immediate response simply referred back to the editor’s note, but my broader response is as follows:

“’Good Camp?’ now that's an interesting response/question.

[Y]our phrasing of the question is highly illustrative of a problem I'm seeing more and more in society here in the US.  We seem to immediately want to know what the "good" is from the "bad", as if every [point of view (POV)] is one or the other automatically.  Many in this group, including myself on occasion, slip into that false dichotomy of bipolar attitudes (good/bad, right/wrong, us/them) as if that is the primary objective and way we should relate to information and one another.

How very sad a fact that is.

If we are to imitate Christ, who we call our savior, we need to really confess our sinfulness, as I am now likewise doing, that we've fallen into this trap.  Are there absolutes that God has put forth in this world?  Yes.  Is there evil that should be countered?  Certainly.  But Jesus makes it clear how we are to judge:  "Judge not, and you will not be judged; condemn not, and you will not be condemned; forgive, and you will be forgiven; give, and it will be given to you; good measure, pressed down, shaken together, running over, will be put into your lap. For the measure you give will be the measure you get back" (Luke 6:37-38 RSV).  We need to hear these words as not just about being careful in calling out evil, but also in being self-satisfied with what we think is "good".

The question isn't if the character on the cover is good or evil, it's what can we learn about ourselves, our relationship with one another (especially as Lutherans), and about our relationship as God's children, his disciples, and a part of his creation?  Does the image bring us closer to truth and in what ways does it take us further away?  There is both Law and Gospel at play here, and in almost everything.  Do we have the eyes to see and the ears to hear?  Or are we living with blinders or are our ears clogged with earbuds?  I pray and hope we become more open and learn to stop asking the  "good camp"/"bad camp" question as the critical point of how we relate to one another and our ideas/motivations/information in our society.”

Obviously this post relates directly to a specific religious discussion context, but it has broader implications socially, ethically, and personally regardless of faith background.  My critique here is that we need to step back from the constant need to find tribe and gravitational pull to poles.  Rather, we need to think about what is also universal, what is common, and what transcends.  Certainly we can find comfort and minimal resistance to our POV among those that are like minded, live in the same places, and function in similar social and work circles, but that can’t be the only way we define ourselves and those around us.  Yes, we are of those things, but we are also, in equal measure, part of one planet, one species, and one physical life to be lived on this planet for each of us.  Does it really matter which “camp” we are in at the end of the day?  I really think it is not; not in the least.  What matters more cannot be defined or even enjoyed based on the “camp” you are in, it’s about quality of life, it’s about freedom and liberty, it’s also about love for those closest to you and for each other so that you don’t fear for the lives of those you love.

So, it’s not about what “camp” we are in.  It’s ultimately about being good campers, period.  It’s agreed that we can’t and shouldn’t all try to fit in the same camp site.  Nor should we splintered into a myriad of unsustainable, undefendable, or unwarranted camp sites.  We need to keep a reasonable number of not too many and not too few, but always remembering that it’s not the camp site that matters, it’s the planet, the creation that you are supposed to be focused on first and foremost.





[i] Cf. the Logia Mission Statement, obtained at http://www.logia.org/mission-statement/ on 18 January 2017
[ii] Its noted I am not going to point out the commenter or the specific response to him, give the nature of this being a closed group, and honoring that discussion’s privacy.

Saturday, August 20, 2011

Thoughts on Death – A New Beginning

So, as noted on my Facebook post last night, I learned of the passing of my old college roommate and friend Jeffrey Soderberg yesterday morning.  I will not repeat all of that post here, except to say this is a man that was full of life; life in abundance, and I am glad to have known him.

This morning however, I have been mulling over the meaning of death for me both emotionally and spiritually and I feel the need to script it out to have a way to share some of this inward dialogue outwardly, especially for those that know me and wonder what goes on in that calcium chamber between my ears.

Let me begin with my first dramatic encounter with death.  When I was young, my parents, before I was aware, had adopted from my Aunt Carla and Uncle Bob in Bridgeport a male pet dog named Brandy.  From my own experience, I can say every boy ought to grow up with a dog (not trying to be gender exclusive, I just cannot speak to the other side).  Being the older brother, Brandy was often my playmate and run-around mate, at least as early as I remember, until my little brother was able to be a running buddy as well (Donald, born 3 years and 6 hours apart, thus sharing the same birthday, talk about superior family planning).  Well, after a time, this not so young dog ended up having some health issues, to the point that he burst a blood vessel in his ear.  My parents, after having paid for one surgery on the ear to correct the problem, were not in a position financially to do a second (Dad being a full time Industrial Arts teacher and summer/spare time contractor, and Mom being a stay at home mother, who worked for the teachers union part-time once we both were in school).  Thus, they opted to put Brandy down.  Timing, however, could not have been worse, as it was the day or two before my (our) Birthday; what a present.  Needless to say, I was a wreck, I remember bellowing and crying for a long while.  I was angry with my parents, blamed God for this, and thought that if I had only been able to be there I could have worked a miracle (being the son of a modern day carpenter, albeit not Jewish, did occasionally give me illusions of grandeur).

Once I had this torrent of emotion subside, I do not recall how I came around.  I do recall the sullen celebration of my (our) Birthday that year and I do remember that not too long after this (a year or so, if I recall correctly), my Great-Grandmother Backus passed on, causing much family in-fighting, which seems how the Backus’ best celebrate the passing of the family matriarch.  But I do know that this is the last time that I became emotionally wrought with the pain of loss to the point of having tears flow in rivers.  Something in me changed, and I think it really had to do with my outlook on death, that it wasn’t the end, and I needed to get on past my selfishness regarding holding onto a tangible notion of life.  Many of my spiritual and emotional growth points, I owe to maxims taught to me by my mother.  For those that don’t know her, she is an intelligent woman, with a large heart, one that sometimes gets her in trouble.  However, she also is a woman of faith, in its core a simple faith, informed well by being a Lutheran Christian, but really more universal than that.  She will tell you plainly, “God is love;” not even contextualizing that this comes as a direct quotation from John’s letters.  In this case, she really believes that everyone goes to heaven, and from there, they that pass, are active in our lives speaking to us and guiding us.  Again, this is not a nuanced or systematic statement of believe, but more of a heartfelt purposely naive maxim of truth for her, and one she passed to me (I will refrain here from going further in my current reflections on this, but see more on this at the end of this post).  But this leads me to the next death experience that has gotten me where I am.

Some years later, when I was in High School, another family death occurred that called us to Long Island, NY for a gathering of the Seaberg clan, my mother’s side of the family.  My Uncle Alan Seaberg had passed on at an age much younger than most would call standard, and being a contemporary (10 or so years older, but no more I think) of my parents, it was oft said that he had gone too early.  This is memorable to me for a lot of reasons.

Alan was a very wealthy self-made man.  His wife, my Aunt Martha, and he had built up the family business from what had been a small immigrant machinery company, to a firm that was building machines and components to feed the growing factories in Japan, China, and throughout the world.  Alan was actually my Mom’s first cousin, being the son of her father’s brother.  Both my Mom and he were first generation Americans, being that my grandparents and siblings all had emigrated from Sweden in the 1920s to the 1940s, seeking a better life for them and their eventual children.  My mother says that my grandfather Carl and his brother Victor worked to help build Holland Tunnel in NY, and were men of their hands.  Victor, Alan’s father, was a machinist, and it is for that reason that the Seaberg Precision Corp, machine company was to be, what it became.  All this history being good, it only begins to describe my Uncle.

Alan, even though he was a multi-millionaire (in a time before billionaires), didn’t carry himself as being one so much as I could tell.  Sure he had a big house in Middle Island, Long Island, NY, with an awesome pool, an old horse farm barn and track, a private pond on his property and lots of toys (adult (e.g a gun or two) and otherwise) to play with.  Nevertheless, he never held himself better than others, nor did he take care to pinch pennies, especially with family.  He had talented kids; one is now a professional musician and, another, an artist.  Moreover, he was a great cheerleader for whatever it was we were passionate about (I even recall him giving my Dad some sage advice about getting out there and expanding his business).  Therefore, when he passed in his late 40s, I can recall the outpouring of love to the family and for him that was shown.  But I also recall, that I never cried.

When he passed, albeit early by many measures, I reflected that his temporal work was done.  I am convinced that Alan was taken from us in bodily form, only because his earthly work was complete.  Not that his efforts were complete in the sense of being done and ready to ship out to the next customer, but that he, like my friend Jeff, had touched so many lives in such a way as to never truly die, instead God has called them home to do other work and to empower other actions.  I can tell you for my own part there is a specific portion of me that continues to emulate and follow in his footsteps.  As I indicated, he was a generous man, especially with family (trust me, his lobster barbeques are still recalled with much admiration).  To this end, while not being of his means, I give as generously as I can, to my church, and especially within the family.  Luckily, my wife is very much of the same mind, and we have had the privilege of being able to host her brothers here at our home in the DC area for large stretches of time, which I continue to see as a greater gift to us, than to them, in many ways.  This gets me to my next confrontations with death.

As can be told by the time spent on them, these two passings probably had the most impact on my life.  But I have had others that have taught me lessons that really extend beyond these primary experiences.  One was the passing of my grandmother Harriet Hall (formerly Backus).  Born in the Depression era, having lost her first husband, my natural grandfather (when my Dad was a pre-teen), she raised two boys, became a known local English and French teacher (so much so that my HS Junior year English teacher came to her funeral and recalled to me how much she had learned and tried to pass on from her) and Librarian, and eventually remarried a gentle, honest man, Stuart Hall.  Having survived both of her husbands, she eventually suffered a stroke that slowly sapped the life out of her.  My father, being the primary actor in her later years, carried the immense stress of not just dealing with her various legal and financial matters but coalescing things to the point of a decision that her time was done.  As she passed and understood all that was going on (her mind was keen, even if weakened by the strokes), it was in her rest that we saw again that gleam that was a hard fought life.  So I learned in this that life isn’t simply breathing, and having a heart pumping physiologically, it is a spark, an essence, a soul that carries us forward; one that we should be very careful about trapping in the confines of the corporeal for our own selfish reasons.

Another, nugget came from the death of a student at Clarkson University in my senior year.  This student, Remmi, had succumbed to alcohol poisoning and passed on at a very young age.  I had only known him in passing, but knew of him in the sense that he was active in the social scene that was in Potsdam, NY.  While there are several facets I can discuss about this situation that can lead to a stigmatized conversation, I believe the lesson that I learned here, is that death can spur action and cement convictions.  For me this incident, this loss of life, was one that fits into the “could have been prevented” column.  However, in the larger sense, while perhaps true, his death has had life now as we contend with the issues that surrounded his passing and determine a path forward to address those issues in our society.  Again, for me, God has a reason for how things happen; this isn’t pure pessimism that we can’t control our own destiny, but it does say that we are given the tools, abilities, and concepts to grapple with this world, and that, in death, we continue to be an active part of that grappling.

Finally, I cannot forget to cite my near death experiences and their effect on how I see the end of corporeal life.  As can be seen from the outset, I am a soldier, and I identify with that profession as much as I do of being an engineer.  Having had two combat tours to Iraq, I have had my brushes with my own mortality.  Sometimes (like the first instance) someone had to tell me we were shot at, and then deal with the possibility, other times (like when Paul Drezen pulled me to the ground during one artillery attack) it was utterly clear.  During the first year of the war, while phone privileges were limited, I made a point of calling Jackie, my wife, before I would “drive across town” (a.k.a. convoy across Baghdad and its environs) to let her know I was alive, and try to call her as soon as I got back (having done several dozen such missions, this wasn’t always possible).  My combat experience has taught me several things about death in this light.

First, we should not try to go out and get ourselves killed, but the randomness of violence in war, makes this possibility very real.  Thus, I am not about to hide on the FOB (Forward Operating Base, as those on my second tour can attest) because we cannot possibly win the war from the FOB (we have to engage with the population and grapple with the enemy), but I am also not going to just jump at the chance to run out and commit suicide.  While I know there is a providential nature to death, and life goes on well beyond the grave, we have a responsibility to do the work we are called to do, through the hazards taking the precautions that are reasonable to the task.

Second, we should assure that we have a plan so that the temporal nature of things does not become the burden for those around us in our passing.  The Army has taught me to have a battle book for the spouse when I leave, and we do that.  She has all of the key info, so if the worst happens, she knows how to contend with the legal, financial, and other aspects, and there is plenty there to do what needs to be done (and even if she can’t, there is a tool that can help another do it with/for her).

Lastly, we need to get our priorities straight in life.  Once you have had these kinds of experiences, certain things in life change.  Somehow, the excitement over inconsequential minutia fades into nothing, and the desire to spend time with loved ones and engage in passions that you have become more critical.  Answering one last email becomes so less important than being there for your wife’s surgery from beginning to end.  Stress and how you deal with it changes, and I know that your reliance on others, and especially something greater than yourself, becomes critically important.  This all enables you to see death in a very different light.

Closing out, I want to get back to the maxims that my Mom spoke, less in wisdom and more in blind faith, as a child.  “Everyone goes to heaven.”  Again, this is simple and profound.  As I have grown and experienced, the more and more I get back to this myself.  Years of study of church theology, especially Lutheran and Catholic fathers, as well as the Bible, reveals a dividing line between the damned and the saved, but this line is as fuzzy as it is defined.  The truth that all are saved who believe in Christ Jesus, and his is the only road, is not to be denied by me, as this is my belief.  Nevertheless, what is Christ Jesus and further what “belief in” means, these are ageless questions.  A fellow soldier once described God as if he were a full sized statue in a rotunda.  From each angle, you get a different view, yet not complete and yet still the same God.  Therefore, for Christians, God looks like a Jewish carpenter from Nazareth, for Muslims he is Allah, for Buddhists he is enlightenment, yet the same statue.  I am not one to say relativism is right, and I am not trying to contend that there are not real differences between faiths, but there are kernels of universal faith that exist throughout (e.g. as St. Paul says, “[t]hat piece of Christ that passes all understanding …”), and thus, “everyone goes to heaven” isn’t entirely without theological basis.  Another: “God is love.”  Not being a Christian Scientist, but having two adoptive grandparents who were, I am highly appreciative of Mary Baker Eddy’s exploration of the love chapter in Corinthians.  She takes the word “Love” in this chapter, and replaces it with “Faith”, and then “Hope” and then, finally “God” (e.g. God is patient, God is kind, …).  While on a whole of scripture perspective this beautiful rendition of this favorite chapter cannot be taken literally in every aspect (e.g. “God does not anger, …” would be refuted in the Old Testament through such examples of his anger with Moses or with Abraham), it does reveal something about the divine.  It says that you can bank on “God is love,” as being your cornerstone.  He is one with creation, and therefore creation is love.  He is one with our hearts, thus we are loved.  He is the great parent, and he loves us in the same way.  And if you take that beyond the temporal example, we recognize that a God that loves, loves us so much that we can die and yet live.  When someone dies, it is my love for him or her that continues forever to speak to me.  So in reflection, part of me continues to believe that death is not the end, mainly because how can my love ever end?

As Jeff is the latest person to be called home that I know, I again am not saddened as much as resolute.  I know he has done his work, it is not how I would have thought his life would have ended, but I know it was not without meaning.  I am not sure what I will take away from this experience, but I am convinced it is not the end, but another beginning, one that will not end, at least in the way we can comprehend.